The following table depicts the statistics on course and teaching evaluation for the spring semester of the academic year 2024-2025, for the M.Sc. "Computer Science".
Number of questionnaires: 29
Participation: 25.22%
Question group | Question | Average for the M.Sc. in "Computer Science" | Average for the University of the Peloponnese |
Α | A.1. The goals of the course were clear. | 5 | 4.2699 |
Α | A.2. The course content was aligned with the goals of the course. | 4.90 | 4.2760 |
Α | A.3. The course content is correlated with the content of other courses. | 4.59 | 3.9489 |
Α | A.4. It is necessary that the seminars/assistive teaching are offered to support students with the course. | 3.17 | 2.8499 |
Α | A.5. The majority of the things you learned within this course were really interesting. | 4.86 | 4.0781 |
Α | A.6. Contemporary information and communication technologies were used in the teaching process. | 4.90 | 3.7740 |
Α1 | A1.7. Were assignments given in a timely fashion? | 5 | 4.3431 |
Α1 | A1.8. Were the assignment delivery of presentation deadlines reasonable? | 5 | 4.3553 |
Α1 | A1.9. The requested deliverables of the assignments were clearly explained. | 5 | 4.1672 |
Α1 | A1.10. The instructor's comments were constructive and detailed. | 5 | 4.1339 |
Α1 | A1. 11. The assignment(s) was/were an important experience and contributed to apply the acquired knowledge. | 5 | 4.1186 |
Β | Β.17. The educational material used aided towards the comprehension of the subject? | 4.97 | 4.0959 |
Β | Β.18. Were the educational material and aids (textbooks, notes, additional bibliography) provided in a timely fashion? | 5 | 4.1468 |
Β | Β.19. Was the bibliography was easily accessible in the institution's library? | 5 | 3.8327 |
Γ | Γ.20. Does the instructor organize well the presentation of the material in the lectures? | 5 | 4.1839 |
Γ | Γ.21. The instructor inspires interest/enthusiasm for the course subject. | 4.93 | 4.0061 |
Γ | Γ.22. The instructor analyses and presents concepts in a straightforward and interesting manner using examples. | 5 | 4.2068 |
Γ | Γ.23. The instructor encourages students to raise questions and objections, developing their critical ability. | 5 | 4.2631 |
Γ | Γ.24. The instructor is punctual in his/her obligations in terms of teaching (timely correction of coursework, consistency in student office hours). | 5 | 4.4463 |
Δ | Δ.25. I attend the lectures regularly | 4.87 | 4.3317 |
Δ | Δ.26. Did the course evaluation methods include mid-term evaluations (assignments, presentations, mid-term exams etc.) (YES/NO) | 96.6% | 76.87% |
Δ | Δ.27. If you anwered YES to the previous question: Did you participate in the mid-term evaluation? (YES/NO) | 89.7% | 87.12% |
Δ | Δ.28. I dedicate on a weekly basis the following number of hours to study on the particular course: 1= <2 hours, 2=2-4 hours, 3=4-6 hours, 4=6-8 hours, 5= >8 hours | 3.74 | 2.5746 |