Statistics on course and teaching evaluation for the winter semester of the academic year 2025-2026

The following table depicts the statistics on course and teaching evaluation for the winter semester of the academic year 2025-2026, for the M.Sc. "Computer Science".

 

Number of courses evaluated: 5 (100% of the courses taught)

Number of questionnaires: 36

Participation: 24.49%

Mean score: 4.51 

 

Question groupQuestionAverage for the M.Sc. in "Computer Science"Average for the University of the Peloponnese
ΑA.1. The goals of the course were clear.4.754.27
ΑA.2. The course content was aligned with the goals of the course.4.724.30
ΑA.3. The course content is correlated with the content of other courses.4.333.93
ΑA.4. It is necessary that the seminars/assistive teaching are offered to support students with the course.2.772.93
ΑA.5. The majority of the things you learned within this course were really interesting.4.644.05
ΑA.6. Contemporary information and communication technologies were used in the teaching process.4.443.70
Α1A1.7. Were assignments given in a timely fashion?4.974.32
Α1A1.8. Were the assignment delivery of presentation deadlines reasonable?4.944.34
Α1A1.9. The requested deliverables of the assignments were clearly explained.4.884.18
Α1A1.10. The instructor's comments were constructive and detailed.4.884.16
Α1A1. 11. The assignment(s) was/were an important experience and contributed to apply the acquired knowledge.4.944.17
ΒΒ.17. The educational material used aided towards the comprehension of the subject?4.474.10
ΒΒ.18. Were the educational material and aids (textbooks, notes, additional bibliography) provided in a timely fashion?4.943.97
ΒΒ.19. Was the bibliography was easily accessible in the institution's library?4.753.92
ΓΓ.20. Does the instructor organize well the presentation of the material in the lectures?4.894.21
ΓΓ.21. The instructor inspires interest/enthusiasm for the course subject.4.724.00
ΓΓ.22. The instructor analyses and presents concepts in a straightforward and interesting manner using examples.4.894.21
ΓΓ.23. The instructor encourages students to raise questions and objections, developing their critical ability.4.834.25
ΓΓ.24. The instructor is punctual in his/her obligations in terms of teaching (timely correction of coursework, consistency in student office hours).4.834.44
ΔΔ.25. I attend the lectures regularly,4.284.26
ΔΔ.26. Did the course evaluation methods include mid-term evaluations (assignments, presentations, mid-term exams etc.) (YES/NO)86.1%77.2%
ΔΔ.27. If you anwered YES to the previous question: Did you participate in the mid-term evaluation? (YES/NO)91.7%86.9%
ΔΔ.28. I dedicate on a weekly basis the following number of hours to study on the particular course: 1= <2 hours, 2=2-4 hours, 3=4-6 hours, 4=6-8 hours, 5= >8 hours2.892.47