Statistics on course and teaching evaluation for the spring semester of the academic year 2024-2025

The following table depicts the statistics on course and teaching evaluation for the spring semester of the academic year 2024-2025, for the M.Sc. "Computer Science".

 

Number of questionnaires: 34

Participation: 33.01% 

 

Question groupQuestionAverage for the M.Sc. in "Computer Science"Average for the University of the Peloponnese
ΑA.1. The goals of the course were clear.4.744.2892
ΑA.2. The course content was aligned with the goals of the course.4.714.3105
ΑA.3. The course content is correlated with the content of other courses.4.504.0007
ΑA.4. It is necessary that the seminars/assistive teaching are offered to support students with the course.3.412.8004
ΑA.5. The majority of the things you learned within this course were really interesting.4.794.0998
ΑA.6. Contemporary information and communication technologies were used in the teaching process.4.683.7581
Α1A1.7. Were assignments given in a timely fashion?4.844.3486
Α1A1.8. Were the assignment delivery of presentation deadlines reasonable?4.874.3663
Α1A1.9. The requested deliverables of the assignments were clearly explained.4.844.2086
Α1A1.10. The instructor's comments were constructive and detailed.4.904.1633
Α1A1. 11. The assignment(s) was/were an important experience and contributed to apply the acquired knowledge.4.874.1729
ΒΒ.17. The educational material used aided towards the comprehension of the subject?4.654.1187
ΒΒ.18. Were the educational material and aids (textbooks, notes, additional bibliography) provided in a timely fashion?4.564.1126
ΒΒ.19. Was the bibliography was easily accessible in the institution's library?4.473.9134
ΓΓ.20. Does the instructor organize well the presentation of the material in the lectures?4.744.2077
ΓΓ.21. The instructor inspires interest/enthusiasm for the course subject.4.714.0346
ΓΓ.22. The instructor analyses and presents concepts in a straightforward and interesting manner using examples.4.764.2332
ΓΓ.23. The instructor encourages students to raise questions and objections, developing their critical ability.4.854.2859
ΓΓ.24. The instructor is punctual in his/her obligations in terms of teaching (timely correction of coursework, consistency in student office hours).4.744.4295
ΔΔ.25. I attend the lectures regularly4.244.2998
ΔΔ.26. Did the course evaluation methods include mid-term evaluations (assignments, presentations, mid-term exams etc.) (YES/NO)91.2%77.44%
ΔΔ.27. If you anwered YES to the previous question: Did you participate in the mid-term evaluation? (YES/NO)85.3%85.99%
ΔΔ.28. I dedicate on a weekly basis the following number of hours to study on the particular course: 1= <2 hours, 2=2-4 hours, 3=4-6 hours, 4=6-8 hours, 5= >8 hours2.882.4967